ONCE AGAIN, THE CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE SHINES SUNLIGHT ON THE DENIZENS OF THE SWAMP AND THE LOONS. Way to go, Sundance and Company!
ONCE AGAIN, THE CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE SHINES SUNLIGHT ON THE DENIZENS OF THE SWAMP AND THE LOONS. Way to go, Sundance and Company!
Today, Stores across the country are having sales. Car dealerships are draped with red white and blue banners where I am. Many of our game websites offer us the chance to get lots more virtual coins, so we can have a shot at winning “the big one”.
The grocery store shelves are picked bare of hotdog and hamburger buns, the delis can hardly keep up with the demand for potato salad, and if you forgot to buy your charcoal, you might be out of luck.
And that is the nature of this day– that they have returned to the Earth, and to that source from which all things were born. That we who are here remember them. Some remember them with prayer, and flags, wreaths placed on their graves. Others remember them in celebration–living and enjoying time with family and friends, savoring the freedom that carries the highest price tag of all.
For freedom requires not only personal responsibility, morality, and the assumption of duty before pleasure, payment before reward–freedom also requires, far more often than should be the case, the blood of our parents. Our children. Our spouses. The surest way to lose freedom, forever, is to forget that is IS a treasure, a gift, and must be guarded.
The surest way to lose freedom, and render the sacrifices of our fallen soldiers worse than meaningless, is for the common man to assume “somebody will fix it”. To assume that “the government” will preserve it. To assume that you are “doing your part” by voting, working, and paying taxes alone. These things are only the beginning of preserving this treasure.
Preserving freedom requires each and every citizen, of any nation, to resist at all costs ANY form of government intervention, social “justice”, or shaming that removes the inherent freedoms all are born with. We must be willing to say NO to tempting visions of “FREE” services–be they healthcare, student loans, housing–promised by governments.
Because a government, by its very nature, is a parasite. It does not create, it only consumes. It is, by its very nature, the antithesis of freedom–for it restricts, it regulates, it takes from some to give to others.
Does this mean we must have NO government? No–because there are some things that work best if done by one agency, in one place. But it DOES mean that to allow ourselves to rely on a government to provide those basic necessities required to live comfortably–or live at all–is a dangerous road to travel. Because the government consumes all things, without distinction. And the appetite of government is insatiable.
So whenever D.C.–or Any government seat says they will give you something free, remember: it is only free because someone else is paying in your place. And—what happens when the people run out of sustenance to feed this beast we have allowed to flourish in our midst?
And when we have been sacrificed to the beast that is our government–if there is a hereafter, and our fallen heroes are there….How can we apologize for the way we treated the treasure they died to preserve?
Sorry, folks–this is still (nominally speaking) a REPRESENTATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. Our founders never intended for us to elect the president–or senators, for that matter.
Originally, We, the people, voted on our state legislatures and the house of representatives–and the STATE LEGISLATORS voted on our state senators, and also chose the ELECTORS. Then the ELECTORS would choose the president and VP. The system was set up this way so that the Senate would directly represent the interest of the several states, and the STATES would have the final check against an executive branch run amok (OBAMA, ANYONE?? ANYONE???).
1913 was a bad year for the Republic, all the way around–we were in the middle of the 1st World War, and this watershed year saw the birth of the IRS and Income Tax, the watering down of the 10th amendment by the 17th Amendment, and the Federal Reserve. For those who are unfamiliar with the Original plan, I highly recommend you go and read what Publius Huldah has to say–a strict constructionist.
So now we have an electoral college that is chosen based on the popular vote in a state. This offers us SOME protection, but not what we once had. Now, what the heck is going on with the electoral college?
At the moment, Trump has 306 electoral votes, and Clinton has the remainder–232. As you only need 270 to become president, this is a good thing. But the current social state of the country is unlike any we have seen before. Hillary Clinton–after claiming that failing to honor the election results is “a direct threat to democracy” in the final debate, is remaining silent while her leftist loon supporters are rioting and threatening the electors. Buzzfeed, a popular leftist loon website, reported that an organization has produced a spreadsheet of electors in Republican states that may be open to “persuasion” and change their electoral vote.
To put this in perspective, Trump would have to lose 37 electors to get un-elected at this point, and as only 157 electors have EVER become “faithless”, this is a pipe dream. Or would be, if the leftist loons weren’t sending death threats, and people weren’t seeing large scale RIOTS causing millions of dollars in damage with little or no intervention from law enforcement. Fear is contagious, and given the fact camp Hillary has said NOTHING to stop the loons from rioting, Obama has stated he won’t tell them to stop , and Justice Sotomayor has also approved of this lawlessness, I couldn’t blame the average Joe who is an elector if they were quite nervous. We have already heard of 2 electors who are planning to be faithless.
We also have an abysmally stupid lawmaker–Barbara Boxer–planning to introduce a law to end the electoral college. And in the middle of all this Hoorah, where is the media?
The MSM is studiously ignoring, for the most part, the high level of threats electors are receiving–though several news outlets have reported on the “faithless” electors that have spoken openly. The media has also failed abysmally when it comes to informing the leftist loons that Barbara Boxer’s “law” is not only utterly UNCONSTITUTIONAL, BUT WOULD NOT APPLY TO THIS ELECTION EVEN IF IT WERE LEGAL.
ATTENTION, MS. BOXER–TO CHANGE THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, YOU NEED AN AMENDMENT. IT AIN’T HAPPENING. ATTENTION, COMPLICIT MEDIA, BY FURTHERING THIS DESTRUCTIVE NARRATIVE YOU ARE INCITING VIOLENCE.
So, here’s a few 64,000.00 questions:
AND THEN–THE BIG QUESTIONS FOR THE DAY–
The last is the real issue, here. Note that Stein and Company are NOT asking for recounts in states where she has ANY LEGITIMATE CHANCE of gaining enough votes for the Green party itself to get up to the 5% threshold needed to be on the ballot as an OFFICIAL PARTY.
Were Dr. Stein doing this on her own behalf or that of the Green Party–with the goal of the party becoming “official”–they would be mounting recounts in BLUE states, and places she already had a better than average showing. So it is safe to assume this is NOT to help the Green Party.
Were she interested in ACTUAL VOTER FRAUD, AS SHE CLAIMS, she would be recounting California, for instance. California is a particular concern, as they do NOT have voter ID–and anyone who applied for a driver’s license is automatically registered to vote. And Governor Brown signed a bill allowing illegal aliens to get driver’s licenses. AND OVER 400,000 DID. Now California CLAIMS you must show “proof of age” to be registered. And that illegal aliens are not registered. But given the fact that there is NO VOTER ID required to vote in California, it would indeed be very easy for non-citizens to vote.
Here in AZ, I have PERSONALLY WITNESSED MEXICAN NATIONALS at the county recorder’s office being removed from the Jury Duty rolls–which are based on driver’s licenses. SO ARE OUR VOTING ROLLS. Yet the county recorder did NOT ascertain that the couple in front of me were not registered to vote. And we have voter ID.
Simple–LOOK AT A MAP OF COUNTIES HILLARY WON. Business Insider offers a very good collection of maps. Clinton only won 14% of counties, compared to Trump’s 86%. But the 14% she won had BIG populations–like Los Angeles County. This is why whenever they lose, especially, Democrats begin screaming to get rid of the electoral college– because metropolitan areas tend to vote BLUE.
Were it not for the electoral college, 14% of the counties in America would effectively be in a position to overpower THE ENTIRE REST OF THE COUNTRY. Our founders went with the electoral system for a very simple reason–they wanted to insure that such a situation would never arise–that ALL states would have a voice in the election process.
That voice was significantly weakened in 1913. But if you look at the maps in that link, you’ll see that the electoral college is more important than ever–because without it, a tiny handful of states would effectively hold the nation’s highest office for as long as the democrats hold control of those states.
And candidates, like Trump, wouldn’t bother campaigning anywhere else. Nor would candidates from any other state have a real chance of winning the presidency–unless they were amazing in one form or another. And given that ONE of those states, California, is doing everything in its power to NOT police the voting system to prevent fraud, that is a frightening prospect indeed.
The democrats began this assault in 1913. And they are not about to stop.
Now that the largest part of the election is over, and we have multiple boycotts along with the typical rioting in the streets and felony behavior on the part of the leftist loons, we can revisit the wonderful world of psychographic segmentation.
So, Forbes had an article this past week about how Jared Kushner won the election for Trump using social media, thanks to a crash basic training course in my field–psychographic segmentation and mass perception management. When I’m not writing professionally, I catalog, analyse and archive data. Some for tin foil hatters, some for marketing firms, some for cultural anthropologists…
You may remember (if you don’t read the rest of the articles in this part of the blog) That Robert Mercer, the reclusive mystery man behind Cambridge Analytica was supporting Ted Cruz, the Banker’s Husband. Given that Mercer owes BILLIONS–not millions–to the IRS and Ted wanted to abolish the income tax, this was a good investment. Thankfully, the Banker’s Husband was finally defeated. Cambridge Analytica was also hired for straight marketing work by Dr Ben Carson and literally hundreds of other politicians nationwide–as political candidates are what they market these days.
AND THAT SHOULD REALLY WORRY YOU. READ THE ARCHIVES.
I began keeping an eye on Jared the first time he appeared on the campaign trail. I was familiar with some of his history, and was simply curious about what kind of guy Ivanka’s hubbie was.Then, when the Banker’s Husband went down in flames and Mercer got behind TRUMP, I started digging deep and archiving EVERYTHING campaign related.
This was shortly before the tone of the online campaign changes dramatically. So I knew C.A. had a team in place. How? “FINGERPRINTS”. You see, each company in this field uses different algorithms and metrics, and therefore, you can ID everyone playing in a particular exercise. So, C.A. was back–but who was the point man?
About the same time C.A. came n board, semantic analysis led me to believe that someone was polishing up Trump’s speeches–actually, 2 someones, a male and a female. The female was easy to spot, as Ivanka has a distinctive style. But weeks of analysis had led nowhere in identifying the male in the picture. Then came AIPAC, and the male behind the speech was obvious–Jared Kushner. This has since been verified by the article in Bloomberg.
And if I hadn’t been over thinking–I would have figured it out a lot sooner. After all, who better to be the male voice than Ivanka’s husband? Intelligent, educated, lives with her all the time, family member.
Rule 1: CONSIDER WHAT YOU KNOW.
Rule 2: DON’T MAKE ASSUMPTIONS.
Having broken both rules, I got back to work, and began extrapolating forward.
I’ll get back to everything between AIPAC and now in later articles. But at the moment, we’re looking at a live operation. And here is what we know:
That’s the “short list”, of course. So what are Cambridge Analytica, Booz Allen Hamilton, The Tin Foil Hat analysts, the Trump social media team under Jared, and I, doing?
WE ARE ANALYZING EVERY WORD YOU TYPE. AND EVERY HASHTAG. Despite google and Twitter, and Facebook, there are ways to determine how well and fast a hashtag propagates other than their “trending” features–which are misinformation tools to begin with.
While I have no doubt whatsoever SOME of these people are doing deep analysis–looking for the real radicals on both sides, scraping identity information, and more, most of us are just compiling aggregate data, and mapping the data points.
If you think of each data point as a color coded PIXEL–and you keep adding more data points–you go from a stick figure to a photograph. And that photograph gives the experts a way to foretell the future. It gives the media disinformation/misinformation creation teams the tools they need to tailor the “news”, for maximum acceptance. It gives the Trump Team intel on their base’s sentiments, while they walk the tightrope over the political volcano without falling in and being consumed.
AND IT GIVES THE OPPOSITION TOOLS TO USE AGAINST US.
So, everyone–watch your words and choice of memes/videos. Because everything we’re doing now online–including my writing this article, that will be tagged to stand out like a lighthouse beacon–is being noted and analysed. AND THIS WILL–NOT CAN, WILL–BE USED AGAINST US. This is more than your average election. This is a very deadly game, behind the scenes. Literally TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS in revenue covering dozens of industry sectors is on the line, and people have been killed for far less than that.
I’ll continue this after the turkey.
Why do I say that? Well, in the last few weeks since the election–WHICH TRUMP WON LEGITIMATELY, WITH 86% OF THE COUNTIES IN THE USA AND THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE– corporate America and the Entertainment Industry have gone insane.
We had one CEO who had to resign after discussing sniper rifles and making direct threats on Facebook–and claiming it was a JOKE. Excuse me–no reasonable person reading what that unhinged leftist wrote would have thought he was joking. Then we had ANOTHER Tech CEO who tweeted threats–and claimed he was HACKED. The two shopworn excuses of leftist loons.
Then, we have this lovely gentleman–Matt Maloney, who runs GrubHub. Grubhub, for those not familiar with it, is a delivery service. Restaurants pay on average a 13% commission to use this service. As you can see by that tweet, HIS customers skew Urban, Female, and Intelligent–and he directly states that Trump supporters are none of the above. Note the date on the tweet–he was an utter ASS even BEFORE THIS EGREGIOUS EMAIL.
So Matt insisted that his email had been “misconstrued”. Really, now. I have shown the email–with no other context–to literally a few hundred people online and in the real world. Ordinary people, all races, ages, colors, political leanings. And even the liberals read it as I did: that if you believe in Trump–and by default IF YOU VOTED FOR THE MAN YOU LIKELY SHARE HIS VIEWS–YOU SHOULD RESIGN. That, my friends, is called creating a hostile work environment.
READ THE ARTICLE LINKED ABOVE, AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF. Based on the tweet from weeks before and this email, the CEO of Grubhub comes off very well–an elitist ass, who has no problem with the idea of mocking current and potential customers AND RESTAURANT OWNERS on Twitter, and no problem creating a hostile work environment either.
Here is an excerpt from the article linked above on his excuse that he was “misconstrued”:
At Grubhub, we welcome and accept employees with all political beliefs, no matter who they voted for in this or any election,” he said. “We do not discriminate on the basis of someone’s principles, or otherwise. The message was intended to advocate for inclusion and tolerance — regardless of political affiliation — during this time of transition for our country.”
I want to clarify that I did not ask for anyone to resign if they voted for Trump,” the statement said. “I would never make such a demand.”
In a tweet that was later deleted, Maloney added: “To be clear, GrubHub does not tolerate hate and we are proud of all our employees – even those who voted for Trump.”
Notice, he claims he never asked trump voters to resign.
BUT THIS IS A DIRECT QUOTE FROM THE FIRST EMAIL:
Maloney said he rejects the “nationalist, anti-immigrant and hateful politics of Donald Trump.”
He also stated that if employees of his acted as Trump did, they would have been fired. And of course the actions in question were taken out of context and have been debunked multiple times.
And the paragraph above states quite clearly–if you do not agree with Matt’s assessment of TRUMP–then quit.
If my employer stated that anyone who agreed with nationalism and the rule of law should submit their resignation, I would certainly interpret that as a hostile work environment, and a direct invitation to leave the company. And for the record, everyone I showed his first message to thought the same.
And when I showed them his excuse–including the later deleted tweet–they said he was full of it. it’s no surprise that their stock has taken a dramatic downturn. I have shown his tweets and emails to local businesses who USED TO USE GRUB HUB–and they don’t any more. Because this is just plain unprofessional and borderline illegal. Successful lawsuits for hostile work environments have risen out of far less direct evidence.
THEN GET YOUR LOCAL EATERY TO DUMP GRUB HUB. THIS IS A VERY COMPETITIVE FIELD IN ANY MAJOR CITY, SO THERE ARE PLENTY OF CHOICES. And for the record–if a right wing business had done the same thing when Obama got elected–I’d be calling them out also. Business is not the place for strident politics–and certainly not taken to this level. SHAME ON YOU, YOU ELITIST ASS.